New Hope If Your Disability Insurance Claim is Denied

If you file a claim for long-term disability insurance benefits, and that claim is denied, arrange at once to meet with a California life and disability insurance claims attorney. That attorney will take the appropriate steps to fight for the disability insurance benefits you deserve and need.

If you have purchased long-term disability insurance through your employer, your policy is likely governed by ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ERISA sets minimum standards for the group insurance plans provided through private employers.

If your ERISA disability insurance claim is rejected, you will not be alone. Claims for disability benefits under ERISA are frequently rejected. If your own claim for disability benefits is denied, arrange at once to speak with a California life and disability insurance claims lawyer.

What Determines Your Eligibility for Disability Insurance Benefits?

Proving to an insurance company that you are disabled is a challenge. A doctor’s statement is usually not sufficient. Even disability claims that are approved by the Social Security Administration may be rejected by an insurance company if you are covered under a group disability policy through an employer.

It is the insurance company’s definition of a disability – and not the Social Security Administration’s definition – that will determine if you qualify for long-term disability insurance benefits.

However, in a recent California case, the Social Security Administration’s award of disability benefits played a key role in a judge’s decision in favor of the plaintiff. It is a precedent-setting decision that may help many more disability insurance applicants obtain their benefits.

What is an Administrative Record?

What is notable about Logan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America is the way the judge considered Mrs. Logan’s Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) award letter.

Her attorneys at McKennon Law Group PC filed a motion to include the SSDI award letter with the administrative record of the case because it was evidence that Mrs. Logan was in fact disabled and because the award letter was not available until after the case’s administrative record had already been prepared.

Generally speaking, new evidence may not be introduced in these cases. When a federal judge hears an ERISA case, the administrative record is typically the only evidence considered. It includes every document provided by the plaintiff or the plan administrator that is pertinent to the case.

Why Was Logan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America Important?

The motion to include the SSDI award letter with the administrative record of Mrs. Logan’s case was denied. However, the judge wrote that the “Social Security Administration’s decision . . . corroborates [Mrs.] Logan’s own and her doctors’ accounts of her disabling pain.”

While the SSDI award letter did not become part of the administrative record, the simple fact that the SSDI award letter was issued was considered supporting evidence for Mrs. Logan’s claim.

As a result of Logan, a court can now use the issuance of an SSDI award letter to support a disability insurance claim even if the award letter is not included in the administrative record of the case.

Read more from the case file here.

What if Your Own Disability Insurance Claim is Denied?

If your own ERISA-based disability insurance claim is denied, consult a California life and disability insurance claims attorney and appeal that denial. Your lawyer will help you prepare an appeal and ensure that you are compliant with ERISA guidelines.

U.S. District Courts have jurisdiction over ERISA-related cases. If you file an administrative appeal with the insurance company to no avail, your California life and disability insurance claims lawyer may then bring a lawsuit against the insurance company in federal court.

After Logan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, if you have been awarded disability benefits by the Social Security Administration, your lawsuit against an insurance company that has denied your disability claim is now more likely to prevail.

If you need ERISA disability or life insurance benefits and your claim has been rejected, act now, and promptly schedule a consultation with a California life and disability insurance attorney such as the highly successful and experienced team for ERISA Claims at McKennon Law Group PC.

Good News if Your Claim for Long-Term Disability Insurance Has Been Rejected

If your application for long-term disability insurance is denied, discuss your rights at once with a California life and disability insurance claims lawyer. That lawyer will take legal action to help you obtain the disability benefits you need and deserve.

In some cases, the denial of a claim for disability insurance may constitute an abuse of discretion by the insurance company, according to a recent ruling handed down by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entitled McGuire v. Life Insurance Company of North America, a case that McKennon Law Group PC handled for its client, Brenda McGuire.

The case was heard in federal rather than state court because the plaintiff’s insurance plan was purchased through her employer, and employer-provided group insurance plans are governed by ERISA, the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

What Are the Two Standards of Review?

If you sue an insurance company that rejects your ERISA governed disability claim, and your California life and disability insurance claims attorney persuades the court that the company’s decision was wrong, even then, your lawsuit may not succeed, depending on the review standard.

Two review standards are used by the courts that hear these cases. A court may use the “abuse of discretion” standard of review or the “de novo” standard of review:

To win a lawsuit under the abuse of discretion review standard, a court must determine that an insurance company’s rejection of your claim abused that company’s discretion. This standard, in which courts must give some deference to disability insurers, is a more difficult standard for a disability insurance claimant to prove under ERISA.

Under the de novo standard of review, a judge only decides whether an insurance company’s rejection of your claim was wrong or right. The de novo standard provides neither side with an advantage going to trial.

What Was Decided in McGuire v. Life Insurance Company of North America?

The District Court determined that Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA) abused its discretion by denying long-term disability benefits to a former community relations manager at Republic Services, a firm that provides waste disposal services across the United States.

The case was decided under the abuse of discretion standard, which is uncommon in ERISA cases pending in California because of a California statute that makes most ERISA cases subject to the de novo standard of review. The court clarified under what circumstances an insurer who denies a disability insurance claim has abused its discretion.

When a court reviews a decision to reject benefits in an ERISA case, it often does so under the de novo standard, which gives no advantage to the insurance company.

Most policies, however, give an insurance company the discretion to determine eligibility for benefits and to construe the policy’s conditions and terms. In these types of cases, the abuse of discretion standard applies if the claimant is from a state that does not have an anti-discretion statute, such as California’s anti-discretion statute.

What Were the Issues in McGuire v. LINA and Why is this Decision Important?

LINA contended that ERISA did not require them to have particular specialists review McGuire’s medical records. The judge Carmac Carney disagreed and found LINA’s failure to use specialists was a procedural irregularity indicating an abuse of discretion.

LINA contended that ERISA does not require that an insurance company have a claimant examined in-person by one of its health professionals and that by not doing so, it did not matter and had no effect on whether it abused its discretion. However, in deciding whether LINA abused its discretion, Judge Carney ruled that this decision to do so does matter.

LINA additionally contended that McGuire’s medical records did not precisely explain how her medical condition prevented her from working. The judge noted that LINA never contacted the doctors to seek clarification and ignored other evidence that verified McGuire’s reports of pain.

LINA also insisted that because McGuire declined surgery and pain medication, she was not disabled. The judge stated that McGuire could not be faulted because pain medications and surgery both carry considerable risk.

The judge found no evidence that McGuire was a malingerer, but he determined that LINA had abused its discretion. The court ruled in McGuire’s favor and awarded her the long-term disability benefits.

Read from the full case file here.

What Should You Know About Disability Insurance Claims?

If you file a disability insurance claim and your claim has been denied – you need the advice that a California life and disability insurance claims lawyer can provide.

Your first legal consultation is provided without cost or obligation. It is your chance to receive the advice you may need and to find out more about how the law may apply to your own situation.

If you need ERISA disability or life insurance benefits and your claim has been rejected, act now, and promptly schedule a consultation with an ERISA claims lawyer such as highly successful and experienced team at McKennon Law Group PC.